I am going
to summarise the article by Claure Bishop called ‘But is it installation art?’
from 1st January 2005. Installation art describes a genre of three
dimensional works that are designed to transform the perception of space. But did installation art ever denote anything? In the 1960s, the word
installation was employed by magazines such as Artforum, Arts
Magazine and Studio International to
describe the way in which an exhibition was arranged, and the photographic
documentation of this arrangement was called an installation shot.
The
Serpentine gallery announced its summer exhibition of work by Gabriel Orozco, “The
leading conceptual and installation and installation artist of his generation”
Ilya
Kabakov- environment in which Kabakovs are installed is also part of his work.
He makes work large enough for us to enter; installation artists’ are inescapably
concerned with the viewers presence.
Installation
art of the 1980s by contrast, was more visual and lavish, often characterised
by giganticism and excessive use of materials. The way in which installation art insists upon
the viewer’s presence in a space has necessarily led to a number of problems
about how it is remembered.
Minimalism drew attention to the space in which the
work was shown, and gave rise to a direct engagement with this space as a work
in itself, often at the expense of any objects. Since then, the distinction
between installation art and an installation of works of art has become
blurred. Both point to a desire to heighten the viewer’s awareness of how
objects are positioned (installed) in a space, and of our response to that
arrangement. But there are important differences. A room of paintings by Glenn
Brown is not the same as a room of paintings byKabakov – because the environment in which Kabakov’s are installed (a fictional
Soviet museum) is also part of the work.
The term “Post-Minimalism”
was first used in reference to a range of art practices that emerged in the
wake of minimalism in the late 1960s. In a similar manner to the term “Post-Impressionism
it serves to gather together a range of styles that are related, yet which often
have very differen, even opposing interests.
Big
audiences are assumed to demand and like big works: wall-sized video/film
projections, oversized photographs and overwhelming sculptures.”Rather than
inducing awareness and provoking thought”
Other
artists have turned installation art into a branch of interior design. Jorge
Pardo’s funky décor for the café bar of K21 in dussledorf exemplifies this
trend, as does Michael Lin;s pink oriental floor design for the lounge of the
Palais de Tokyo.
Mike Kelley’s
The Uncanny 1993. The uncanny was
experienced as a collection of unsettling sculptures and polychromatic human
doubles. As the critic Alex Farquharson wrote in a review “ Instead of feeling
we were in a modern art gallery, it seemed we’d stumbled on a horror film set,
an eighteenth- century anatomy lesson, a hideous crime scene.
The variety
of work detailed above demonstrates that installation art means many things. ”a
mode and type of production rather than a movement or strong ideological
framework”.
No comments:
Post a Comment