Putting the emotional tonality to one side, Estep questions
the artist intent and purpose of publishing such private images. Family secrets are usually not exploited at
all; never mind in this sort of manner and I concur with Estep on questioning
why would you allow the privacy of your own family to be exposed?
He talks about the familiarity of photographing ones family
and friends but how awkward they could come across to Billingham as well as the
viewer, they are somewhere between empathy and cruelty, love and hate, which I
half agree on because I think it comes down to the individual and their family
background. I believe that it’s one or
the other, not in between like Estep suggests.
With Billingham moving on to urban landscape work Estep suggests,
“they feel less specific, and less driven by personality” and are overshadowed
by earlier work which I believe is true but however, I think this is fairly
obvious because how can there be anything as personal as family and the family
home?
I believe that Estep’s article is thoroughly done, and
raises lots of interesting questions about the motives of the artist and the
book, however I do believe that he rambled on too much in certain areas of the
article.
Reference:
Estep, J. New Art Examiner, September 1999, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p28, http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?sid=d840dd7d-f2ed-4fdb-b944-0094e335296c%40sessionmgr112&vid=1&hid=119&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=aft&AN=505827343
No comments:
Post a Comment